Washington Lobbyist Kingpin Grover “Norquist’s Muslim Protégés”
comment by Jerry Gordon
Paul Sperry, author the the book “Infiltration” about Islamist networks burrowing into our government and political institutions, has produced this FrontPageMagazine dossier about the infamous red-haired king of K Street Lobbyists, Grover Norquist. Norquist has been revered among Republican Conservatives for his leadership of lobbyists in pushing the Bush tax reforms through the Congress early in his first term. Norquest was in demand for his Wednesday policy wonk seminars on ‘how to do it’. He could scoot over to the Oval office for sessions with former White House aide, Karl Rove about reaching out to Muslims. Norquist was tainted by association, but, never considered a person of interest by federal prosecutors in the shabby Jack Abramoff lobbying affair. A Washington scandal that saw Abramoff - a Young American for Freedom President promoted by Norquist in their respective college days-Abramoff at Brandeis University and Norquist at Harvard- back in the 1970’s. Norquist ‘married’ a Palestinian Muslim woman and State Department USAID PR person in a showy ecumenical event in April, 2005. Norquist had an alliance with convicted Islamist terrorist fund launderer, Abdurahman Alamoudi, convicted for a term of 23 years for his financial acts and serving his term in a federal prison. Almoudi bankrolled the formation of the Islamic Institute of Free Enterprise that was co-chaired with Norquist. Then there was the penetration of the American Conservative Union by a Muslim protege of Norquist, Suhail Kahn. The alleged ‘Islamization’ of the ACU was orchestrated by Norquist and David Keene, after the former’s ascent to the Board of the ACU. Sperry in this FrontPageMagazine discusses Norquists attempts to insinuate in the political process in the Commonwealth of Virginia, two Muslims. Kamal Narwash, whom we have posted on, and Faisal Muhammad Gill. Note that both have lost in State elections in Virginia, that Sperry cites:
Last November, his crony Faisal M. Gill lost a bid for a seat in the Virginia state legislature. Now another protege, Kamal M. Nawash, has lost his third political race in seven years. Republicans in Virginia’s most affluent county last month overwhelmingly rejected Nawash as their party leader. Gill and Nawash failed despite the ringing endorsements and behind-the-scenes maneuvering of Norquist, who founded the Islamic Institute (where he met his Palestinian wife) with the express purpose of promoting such Muslims into positions of power.
But Speery goes on to chronicle Narwash’s and Gill’s relatiionship with convicted Alamoudi, the Islamist kingmaker in DC. But Gill who had dealings with shadowy al Qaeda and Saudi interests ended up holding a p;osition at the DHS.
But read this disclosure about Gill from a DHS Inspector general report:
However, the DHS inspector general didn’t exactly exonerate him. He concluded only that he could find no evidence that Gill had “falsified” relevant information or “intentionally” omitted it.
In fact, former DHS Inspector General Clark Kent Ervin — the official whose office investigated Gill — was troubled by Gill’s ties to Alamoudi, and now questions why he was ever hired for such a sensitive post in the first place.
“Should anyone even remotely connected to terrorism be employed by Homeland Security in any capacity, especially the ultrasensitive area of intelligence and infrastructure protection?” Ervin said regarding Gill in his book, “Open Target.”
Indeed, this former lobbyist for a known al-Qaida terrorist had access to top secret U.S. intelligence involving not only border security, but cyber-security, including new data-sharing programs integrating terrorist watch lists. Actually, Gill still has access to such intelligence. His TS/SCI clearance was never revoked.
The government may want to review his clearance based on other ethical lapses that have come to light since he left the government. Gill has shown a pattern of omission and deception.
So I ask you, why should Republicans and Conservatives cozy up to the likes of Grover Norquist and his Muslim proteges?
by Paul Sperry, FrontPageMagazine, June 3, 2008
If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again. That appears to be the strategy of GOP powerbroker Grover Norquist in his wicked project to dress Islamists up as patriotic Republicans so they can infiltrate the government.
While he’s managed to get some of his Muslim proteges jobs in the Bush administration, getting them elected to public office has been another story. Voters aren’t buying their makeover.
Last November, his crony Faisal M. Gill lost a bid for a seat in the Virginia state legislature. Now another protege, Kamal M. Nawash, has lost his third political race in seven years. Republicans in Virginia’s most affluent county last month overwhelmingly rejected Nawash as their party leader.
Gill and Nawash failed despite the ringing endorsements and behind-the-scenes maneuvering of Norquist, who founded the Islamic Institute (where he met his Palestinian wife) with the express purpose of promoting such Muslims into positions of power.
Take Nawash, who also happens to be Palestinian. In 2003, Norquist hosted a fundraiser for him at his Capitol Hill townhouse to launch his campaign for the Virginia state senate. And Norquist’s partner Khaled A. Saffuri kicked in $1,279 to help build his war chest.
Nawash made for a strange Republican candidate. As an immigration lawyer he defended Arab criminals against deportation, and as legal director of the extremist American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, he fought to deny law enforcement key anti-terror tools.
A month before the election, Nawash rushed to the defense of a prominent Islamist leader and political donor, who was arrested on terrorism charges. His crony, Abdurahman Alamoudi, was no dimestore terrorist. It turned out that Alamoudi, according to the Treasury Department, acted as one of al-Qaida’s top fundraisers in America — all the while pumping more cash into Nawash’s campaign than any other individual contributor.
Nawash argued the case against Alamoudi was baseless and politically motivated, according to the Islamist internet site IslamOnline.net, which identified him as Alamoudi’s lawyer.
“He is just a liberal Muslim, who wants more Muslims to be involved in the U.S. military and politics,” Nawash said of his longtime friend, client and donor.
That “liberal” Muslim is in fact a longtime leader in the radical Muslim Brotherhood who’s now serving 23 years in federal prison for plotting terrorism.
When Nawash’s opponent in the race used his quotes against him, Nawash denied Alamoudi was a client. He said IslamOnline.net erroneously identified him as the terrorist’s lawyer, even though Nawash’s own brother worked for the website. (Continue Reading this Article)
June 3rd, 2008 at 7:39 • opinion • FrontPageMagazine • Paul Sperry • Grover Norquist K street Conservatrive lobbyist • outreach to Muslims • Muslim proteges • 0 Comments •
Note: Comments on articles are unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of American Congress for Truth, Brigitte Gabriel or the Editor or the staff of American Congress for Truth. Any comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, harassing or otherwise annoying may be summarily deleted at the sole discretion of the Editor. However, the fact that comments remain on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Brigitte Gabriel, the Editor or the Staff of American Congress for Truth.
No Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
You need an OpenID login to post a comment. Learn more about setting up an OpenID
You must be logged in to post a comment.

