“Ignoring what extremists say about Jihad” and dhimmitude in Washington
comment by Jerry Gordon
Read these comments of former Chairman of the joint Chiefs of Staff, Marine General Peter Pace and think of how rapidly we have descended into official dhimmitude since July, 2007, when courageous Stephen Coughlin wrote this deathless prose. Coughlin has been marginalized and the official lexicon of the US government has virtually expunged the terms “jihad” and “jihadist”. Coughlin is one of the honorees as a ‘hero of conscience’ at an event sponsored by the American Freedom Alliance to be held at the Reagan Library on May 18th. Coughlin still has not received confirmation of his new assignment, and as we noted in a recent post his nemesis at the Pentagon, Deputy Defense Secretary England has Muslim Brotherhood ‘outreach” specialist, Heshem Islam on his staff.
Note what Coughlin writes about the importance of understanding the core of Jihad threat doctrine in Islamic law:
The reason the Intelligence Community is unable to define the nature of the jihadi enemy, the Chairman implies, is because we have not “read what the enemy has said.” In other words, we have failed to undertake an assessment of the threat based on the jihadi enemy’s declared strategic doctrine. This conclusion leads to three fundamental research questions:
* Why have we failed to do a doctrine-based threat assessment?
* What is the doctrinal basis of the jihad threat?
* How can we come to understand the jihadi threat?
by Stephen Coughlin, Major, Military Intelligence, USAR, July 2007
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff [of the US Armed Forces], General Peter Pace explained that:
To talk about how we are going to proceed, we need to understand the nature of the enemy. And clearly, the nature of this enemy is different than any we have faced in the past …. Our enemies had declared war on us years before, but the attacks in New York, in the skies over Pennsylvania and here in Washington, D.C. brought home very clearly to us that we were at war.
Consistent with the Chairman’s injunction is the implication that after five years of prosecuting the War on Terror (WOT) we still don’t understand the nature of the enemy, a devastating indictment of the Intelligence Community’s inability to define the jihadi threat. Inherent in the Chairman’s acknowledgment that the enemy “is different than any we have faced in the past,” is the implication that we need to reconsider how we determine what motivates and animates the enemy in order to clarify the jihadi threat. Confident in our ability to meet this challenge, General Pace affirmed that
-
there is no way we can lose if we maintain our patience and our…resolve. But it’s also true that inside of that patience and resolve, we should execute our mission as smartly as we possibly can.
Continuing with his speech, General Pace suggested a simple starting point for improving our understanding and thereby our mission execution:
I say you need to get out and read what our enemies have said. Remember Hitler. Remember he wrote Mein Kampf. He said in writing exactly what his plan was, and we collectively ignored that to our great detriment. Now, our enemies have said publicly on film, on the Internet, their goal is to destroy our way of life. No equivocation on their part. They’re not saying if you stay home, we will not come after you. They are saying their goal is to rid the Middle East of all foreigners. Then, overthrow all governments that are not friendly to them, which means every single one of those governments. Then, to use that base as a way to spread their terrorism and their oppression across the globe to include a map that shows 100 years from now that the entire globe will be under their domination.
By singling out Mein Kampf as his example, General Pace focused on Hitler’s declared strategic doctrine, used by the Nazis as the foundation for their tactical employment of Iraq, military, political, economic, and social instruments of power to establish the 1,000 year Reich. Likewise, the nature of today’s jihadist enemies can only be understood within the context of their declared strategic doctrine to dominate the world.
Just as we ignored Mein Kampf “ to our great detriment” prior to World War II, so we are on the verge of suffering a similar fate today. The reason the Intelligence Community is unable to define the nature of the jihadi enemy, the Chairman implies, is because we have not “read what the enemy has said.” In other words, we have failed to undertake an assessment of the threat based on the jihadi enemy’s declared strategic doctrine. This conclusion leads to three fundamental research questions:
* Why have we failed to do a doctrine-based threat assessment?
* What is the doctrinal basis of the jihad threat?
* How can we come to understand the jihadi threat?
A brief discussion of the research questions will be used to frame the hypothesis that Islamic law forms the doctrinal basis of the jihadi threat that can only be understood through an unconstrained review of the the Islamic law of jihad.
May 7th, 2008 at 10:27 • opinion • STEPHEN COUGHLIN • Jihad Islamic law threat doctrine • dhmmitude in Washington • 1 Comment •
Note: Comments on articles are unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of American Congress for Truth, Brigitte Gabriel or the Editor or the staff of American Congress for Truth. Any comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, harassing or otherwise annoying may be summarily deleted at the sole discretion of the Editor. However, the fact that comments remain on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Brigitte Gabriel, the Editor or the Staff of American Congress for Truth.
1 Comment
-
[…] the British lost their Empire; it seems that they’ve… saved by IStalkGaaraKun2009-04-01 - “Ignoring what extremists say about Jihad” and dhimmitude in … saved by Emowanab2009-03-28 - The UN Strikes Another Blow for Dhimmitude saved by […]
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
You need an OpenID login to post a comment. Learn more about setting up an OpenID
You must be logged in to post a comment.

